← 返回上一级 ID: 2433

URL: https://www.sbmchina.com/media/articals/336.html

AI 检查建议:

【第 1 段建议】: 1. "lmpact" should be corrected to "Impact" (the letter 'l' should be 'I'). 2. "SMP Crushing Plant" (this seems to be in a consistent format with other similar names, but ensure that it aligns with the actual product name). 3. The phrase "should be us" at the end is incomplete; it should be "should be used". --- 【第 2 段建议】: 1. "the finess within 325 mesh" 应为 "the fineness within 325 mesh" 2. "the finess of 800 mesh or so." 应为 "the fineness of 800 mesh or so." 3. "there are many customers have doubts about it." 应为 "there are many customers who have doubts about it." 4. "Today we are gonna to know" 应为 "Today we are going to know" 5. "ball mill." 应为 "ball mills." 6. "with good particle and high added value." 应为 "with good particles and high added value." 7. "years of experience in grinding mill prod" 应为 "years of experience in grinding mill production." --- 【第 3 段建议】: 1. "type" should be pluralized to "types" in "there are many different type of grinding mill in the market." 2. "the users' requirements" should be "users' requirements" for consistency in context. 3. "noise elimination room" could be more clearly written as "noise-elimination room." 4. "d97≤5μm" should be corrected to "d97≤5μm." 5. "we ‘ll" should be corrected to "we'll." 6. "brochures, catalogs)" should use a regular parenthesis instead of a Chinese closing parenthesis, changing it to "brochures, catalogs)." 7. "Get Price More" is unclear and may need improvement for clarity. 8. "Equipment" in the demand section should be lowercase to be consistent with the rest of the list. Overall corrections involve pluralization, clarity, punctuation, and consistency.
标记为已完成修改